Medicine
Updated 2026-10-18
Practice a medical school MMI station from the reading minute through a course of action you can say out loud.
Stations reward a person who can hold still long enough to understand the problem. You get a short prompt, a quiet minute or two, and then a conversation that is usually six to eight minutes. One station is the whole mock. A second prompt is a different day.
The point is not a perfect verdict. The interviewer is listening for whether you can see more than one reasonable view, name who would be affected, attach an ethical idea that actually fits, and propose a step a real person could take. A speech about how much you care does not do that work.
This page does not tell you what a school will ask, and it does not tell you how to treat a patient or what the law requires. Use it to practice the shape of an answer. When a live circuit uses its own prompt, the shape still helps.
Try a free spoken mock with this round already selected. Feedback quotes your own answers. No card.
Start the free mockUse the quiet minute on the prompt itself. Show that you read it, that you know who is in the story, and that you can start without a memorized introduction. If you need the prompt repeated, ask. Guessing at a word you skipped is how answers drift.
1. What is the conflict in this prompt, in one sentence you could say before you take a side?
What they are checking: A useful opening names the clash and the people in it, instead of a slogan about doing the right thing.
Follow-up: Which word in the prompt did you almost skip, and why does it matter?
2. Who has something to lose if you stay silent, and who has something to lose if you speak?
What they are checking: Notice whether both sides get a concrete stake, not a single hero and a single villain.
Follow-up: Which of those people is absent from the room while you decide?
3. How long do you want before you answer, and what will you do with that quiet minute?
What they are checking: The useful detail is a plan for the pause, such as rereading the last line, rather than a claim that you think fast.
Follow-up: What would you ask to have repeated if the prompt was spoken once?
The person across from you is judging whether your reasoning can be followed by someone who was not in your head. They are not scoring a secret key. Say the assumption you are making. If the prompt leaves out a fact you wish you had, name that fact and then decide with what you do have.
1. What sentence would you say first to the person who is most upset, and what would you leave out of that sentence?
What they are checking: A strong reply includes words you could speak, plus one thing you would refuse to guarantee in the moment.
Follow-up: How does that sentence change if a third person is listening?
2. Which fact, if you learned it tomorrow, would reverse the step you just chose?
What they are checking: Listen for a real condition that would change the plan, not a shrug that every case is different.
Follow-up: Which opinion would you hear and still not treat as a fact?
3. What do you do in the next hour, and what do you deliberately put off until you have talked to someone with authority?
What they are checking: The part that matters is a split between your own next step and the decision that is not yours to make.
Follow-up: Whom do you tell if the person asks you to keep the whole thing private?
Name a principle in ordinary language: honesty, fairness, a person's say over their own life, or the duty not to cause harm you could avoid. Then show how that principle picks a step. Dropping the name of a principle with no link to the prompt sounds rehearsed.
1. Which ethical idea fits this station, and which idea did you consider and set aside?
What they are checking: The reply should tie the idea to a specific line in the prompt and admit a second idea that almost won.
Follow-up: How would you explain that idea to a classmate who has never taken an ethics class?
2. How do you tell someone their plan hurts another person without calling them a bad person?
What they are checking: A useful reply separates the action from the character and still names the harm.
Follow-up: What tone do you want in the first sentence, and what tone are you trying not to use?
3. Where does this station stop being your decision and start being a job for a clinician, a teacher, or the person in charge?
What they are checking: Notice a clean boundary, with no invented protocol and no claim that you already hold that job.
Follow-up: What do you say if they insist you must already know the answer?
Some stations stop being hypothetical and ask for a time you lived a similar tension. Use one real episode. Keep it small enough to finish. Say what you wanted, what the other person wanted, what you did, and what you would repeat. If the episode is from school, say so. Do not upgrade a club role into a clinical one.
1. Tell me about a time you disagreed with a group that wanted a quick fix. What did you say before they voted?
What they are checking: The useful part is your sentence and the group's stake, not a lecture about teamwork in general.
Follow-up: What did you do after you lost, if you lost?
2. When did you protect someone's privacy at a cost to yourself, and what was the cost?
What they are checking: A believable account names the cost, such as a grade or a friendship, and the limit of what you shared.
Follow-up: What would you still have shared if safety had been the issue?
3. Describe a time you were asked to stay quiet about something that did not sit right. How did you decide?
What they are checking: Listen for the person you talked with and the reason you did not handle it alone.
Follow-up: What would have made silence the better choice?
The close of a station is where people ramble. Stop when the step is clear. Offer one question you still have about the prompt, if a question would change your step. Thanking the actor is fine. A summary of your entire moral outlook is not.
1. What is still unresolved at the end of your answer, and why are you willing to leave it unresolved?
What they are checking: A useful close names the open question and the step you would take anyway.
Follow-up: What would you write down in the minute before the next station?
2. If the actor pushes you to pick a harsher option, what part of your plan stays, and what part can move?
What they are checking: Notice a stable commitment and a flexible detail, so the answer does not collapse or freeze.
Follow-up: What sentence tells them you heard the push?
You usually face one prompt at a time, with a short reading period and a few minutes to talk. A panel spends longer on your path and your past examples. Practice the station as a single conversation, not as a tour of your application.
Read the prompt twice. Underline who is affected and what you are being asked to do tonight. Decide the first sentence you will say. If you outline five principles, you will still be outlining when the time starts.
Use a name only when you can say what it demands in this prompt. Honesty, fairness, a person's control over their own life, and avoiding harm you could prevent are enough if you connect them to a step. A list of names with no step sounds borrowed.
Say what you would do, what you are unsure about, and what fact would change your mind. Stations are built so that decent people can disagree. A forced certainty is weaker than a reason you can follow.
Only if it is short and true, and only after you have dealt with the prompt in front of you. A personal story that replaces the prompt leaves the actor with nothing to push on. Keep names and identifying details out.
Practice questions written by Round Rehearsal. Not any employer's actual questions.
Try a free spoken mock with this round already selected. Feedback quotes your own answers. No card.
Start the free mock